본문으로 바로가기
Ess-neofab

A line- and system-level record of ESS and secondary-battery manufacturing processes

  • 한국어
  • English
  • Home
  • Process
  • System
  • Interface
  • Traceability
  • News & Trends
  • About
  • Contact
  • 한국어
  • English
  • Home
  • Process
  • System
  • Interface
  • Traceability
  • News & Trends
  • About
  • Contact

카테고리

  • Interface (28)
  • News & Trends (20)
  • Process (32)
  • System (31)
  • Traceability (22)

최근 글

  • Five million ACC cells equal 2.7 to 3.6 months of nameplate outputOctober 15, 2026
  • A 160 MW battery’s six-week commissioning has two baselinesOctober 8, 2026
  • Two Cycles a Day Take 106.8 % of a Day, and the Retention Tier Shifts Cell Volume by 1.47 GWhOctober 1, 2026
  • Battwoo’s Second-Life EV Batteries — When an 80 % Acceptance Threshold Overlaps the Retirement Distribution, Incoming Screening Becomes the BottleneckSeptember 30, 2026
  • US storage set an energy record in Q2 as installed power fell 7%September 29, 2026
  • CATL Starts Trial Production in Debrecen — The Digits of the Defect-Rate Target, Not the Equipment, Set the Length of a Trial RunSeptember 29, 2026
  • 포항 LFP 양극재 출하에서 조지아 ESS 셀 라인 입고까지 45일 리드타임과 안전재고 1,138 t를 나타낸 인터페이스 도식
    Interface,  Process

    45 Days from Pohang to Georgia — Safety Stock at an Intercontinental Cathode Interface Is Driven by Lead-Time Variability, Not Demand

    September 23, 2026 /

    SK On’s roughly KRW 1.0742 trillion LFP cathode contract with POSCO Future M (2027–2029, for its Georgia ESS cell line) puts a continent and an ocean crossing between the materials and cell plants. Under an assumed scenario (45-day lead time, σL 7 days, 98.1 t/day), safety stock in front of the Georgia cell line is about 1,138 t, 99.1% of which comes from the lead-time variability term. Halving lead-time variability cuts it to 577 t; halving demand variability leaves it at 1,136 t. At an intercontinental interface, the management variable is the spread of arrival times, not the demand forecast.

    read more
    ESS-neofab 3 Comments

    You May Also Like

    레이저 노칭 헤드 사이클타임 1.20초와 라인 택타임 0.95초를 비교해 필요 헤드 수 2대를 도출한 도식

    The Interface Between Laser Notching Cycle Time and Line Takt Time — The Head-Count Sizing Problem Revealed by DI ENT’s Ohio Supply Contract

    September 7, 2026
    팩 조립업체 이원 수주 셀 ID 트레이서빌리티 이벤트 부하 비교 — ESS 모듈 8GWh 796만 건 vs HEV 팩 0.45GWh 1,680만 건 (가정 시나리오)

    Sebang Lithium Battery’s Simultaneous HEV Pack and ESS Module Orders — Analyzing the Cell-Inbound Interface and Cell-ID Traceability Load

    September 8, 2026
    로봇 자동화설비 사이클타임 78초와 라인 택타임 60초 격차, OEE 성능요소 손실 23.1%p를 보여주는 막대그래프

    Introducing Robotic Automation Equipment — Where Does the Interface with Line Takt Time Break Down

    September 2, 2026
© 2026 Ess-neofab · A line- and system-level record of ESS and secondary-battery manufacturing processes
  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy
  • Disclaimer
Ashe Theme by WP Royal.