본문으로 바로가기
Ess-neofab

A line- and system-level record of ESS and secondary-battery manufacturing processes

  • 한국어
  • English
  • Home
  • Process
  • System
  • Interface
  • Traceability
  • News & Trends
  • About
  • Contact
  • 한국어
  • English
  • Home
  • Process
  • System
  • Interface
  • Traceability
  • News & Trends
  • About
  • Contact

카테고리

  • Interface (28)
  • News & Trends (20)
  • Process (32)
  • System (31)
  • Traceability (22)

최근 글

  • Five million ACC cells equal 2.7 to 3.6 months of nameplate outputOctober 15, 2026
  • A 160 MW battery’s six-week commissioning has two baselinesOctober 8, 2026
  • Two Cycles a Day Take 106.8 % of a Day, and the Retention Tier Shifts Cell Volume by 1.47 GWhOctober 1, 2026
  • Battwoo’s Second-Life EV Batteries — When an 80 % Acceptance Threshold Overlaps the Retirement Distribution, Incoming Screening Becomes the BottleneckSeptember 30, 2026
  • US storage set an energy record in Q2 as installed power fell 7%September 29, 2026
  • CATL Starts Trial Production in Debrecen — The Digits of the Defect-Rate Target, Not the Equipment, Set the Length of a Trial RunSeptember 29, 2026
  • Isometric concept of translucent blocks stepping down from loading time through stop, speed and defect losses to valuable operating time
    Process,  System

    If Availability, Performance and Quality Are All 80 %, OEE Is 51.2 % — How to Calculate OEE

    September 25, 2026 /

    OEE (overall equipment effectiveness) is calculated as availability × performance × quality, and the Japan Institute of Plant Maintenance (JIPM) gives the example that when all three factors are 80 %, OEE is 51.2 %. When the three factors are multiplied as JIPM defines them, OEE is organized as "standard (planned) cycle time × number of good units ÷ loading time," that is, the share of loading time spent making good units at the standard speed. In an assumed shift (loading time 27,600 s, standard cycle time 32 s, 690 good units), availability is 90.0 %, performance 90.4 % and quality 98.3 %, giving an OEE of 80.0 %. If…

    read more
    ESS-neofab 2 Comments

    You May Also Like

    A 0.45 pp read-rate gap means 10x exceptions

    Cell-ID Laser DPM Read Rate 99.5% vs 99.95%: How No-Reads Drive Exceptions per Shift and OEE

    July 3, 2026
    ESS-LFP 라인 5단 공정 흐름과 양산전환 6개월 구간 OEE 목표 시나리오(1개월 61%, 3개월 74%, 6개월 85%) 도식

    The Equipment Maker’s Line-Ownership Shift — OEE and Takt-Time Design During the ESS-LFP New-Line Mass-Production Ramp-Up

    August 23, 2026
    포항 LFP 양극재 출하에서 조지아 ESS 셀 라인 입고까지 45일 리드타임과 안전재고 1,138 t를 나타낸 인터페이스 도식

    45 Days from Pohang to Georgia — Safety Stock at an Intercontinental Cathode Interface Is Driven by Lead-Time Variability, Not Demand

    September 23, 2026
© 2026 Ess-neofab · A line- and system-level record of ESS and secondary-battery manufacturing processes
  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy
  • Disclaimer
Ashe Theme by WP Royal.