본문으로 바로가기
Ess-neofab

A line- and system-level record of ESS and secondary-battery manufacturing processes

  • 한국어
  • English
  • Home
  • Process
  • System
  • Interface
  • Traceability
  • News & Trends
  • About
  • Contact
  • 한국어
  • English
  • Home
  • Process
  • System
  • Interface
  • Traceability
  • News & Trends
  • About
  • Contact

카테고리

  • Interface (28)
  • News & Trends (20)
  • Process (32)
  • System (31)
  • Traceability (22)

최근 글

  • Five million ACC cells equal 2.7 to 3.6 months of nameplate outputOctober 15, 2026
  • A 160 MW battery’s six-week commissioning has two baselinesOctober 8, 2026
  • Two Cycles a Day Take 106.8 % of a Day, and the Retention Tier Shifts Cell Volume by 1.47 GWhOctober 1, 2026
  • Battwoo’s Second-Life EV Batteries — When an 80 % Acceptance Threshold Overlaps the Retirement Distribution, Incoming Screening Becomes the BottleneckSeptember 30, 2026
  • US storage set an energy record in Q2 as installed power fell 7%September 29, 2026
  • CATL Starts Trial Production in Debrecen — The Digits of the Defect-Rate Target, Not the Equipment, Set the Length of a Trial RunSeptember 29, 2026
  • Isometric concept of a changeover split into internal work while stopped and external work while running, from last piece to first good piece
    Process

    Is a Changeover Planned Downtime or an Availability Loss? — How the Definition Changes OEE

    September 25, 2026 /

    Whether a changeover (also called a setup) counts as planned downtime or as an availability loss differs from source to source, and because that choice alone changes availability and OEE substantially, changeover time must be tracked as a metric separate from OEE. The "Downtime" entry in the Lean Enterprise Institute (LEI) lexicon classifies changeovers to produce other products as planned downtime, while the Japan Institute of Plant Maintenance (JIPM) classifies setup and adjustment as a stop loss in availability. In an assumed shift (loading time 27,600 s, changeovers 3,000 s, breakdowns 600 s), availability is 87.0 % under the JIPM approach and 97.6 % under a planned-downtime approach that subtracts…

    read more
    ESS-neofab 0 Comments

    You May Also Like

    A 0.45 pp read-rate gap means 10x exceptions

    Cell-ID Laser DPM Read Rate 99.5% vs 99.95%: How No-Reads Drive Exceptions per Shift and OEE

    July 3, 2026
    LFP 고압축밀도 전환 시 캘린더링 닙압력·라인속도 인터페이스와 택타임·OEE 영향 시나리오 도식

    LFP High-Compaction-Density Conversion and the Calendering Interface: How Nip Pressure and Line Speed Affect Takt Time

    September 1, 2026
    Formation data belongs to the slot, not the cell

    Linking Cell History in Formation and Aging: History Contamination from Tray ID + Slot Mapping

    July 11, 2026
© 2026 Ess-neofab · A line- and system-level record of ESS and secondary-battery manufacturing processes
  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy
  • Disclaimer
Ashe Theme by WP Royal.