본문으로 바로가기
Ess-neofab

A line- and system-level record of ESS and secondary-battery manufacturing processes

  • 한국어
  • English
  • Home
  • Process
  • System
  • Interface
  • Traceability
  • News & Trends
  • About
  • Contact
  • 한국어
  • English
  • Home
  • Process
  • System
  • Interface
  • Traceability
  • News & Trends
  • About
  • Contact

카테고리

  • Interface (28)
  • News & Trends (20)
  • Process (32)
  • System (31)
  • Traceability (22)

최근 글

  • Five million ACC cells equal 2.7 to 3.6 months of nameplate outputOctober 15, 2026
  • A 160 MW battery’s six-week commissioning has two baselinesOctober 8, 2026
  • Two Cycles a Day Take 106.8 % of a Day, and the Retention Tier Shifts Cell Volume by 1.47 GWhOctober 1, 2026
  • Battwoo’s Second-Life EV Batteries — When an 80 % Acceptance Threshold Overlaps the Retirement Distribution, Incoming Screening Becomes the BottleneckSeptember 30, 2026
  • US storage set an energy record in Q2 as installed power fell 7%September 29, 2026
  • CATL Starts Trial Production in Debrecen — The Digits of the Defect-Rate Target, Not the Equipment, Set the Length of a Trial RunSeptember 29, 2026
  • Isometric concept of a changeover split into internal work while stopped and external work while running, from last piece to first good piece
    Process

    Is a Changeover Planned Downtime or an Availability Loss? — How the Definition Changes OEE

    September 25, 2026 /

    Whether a changeover (also called a setup) counts as planned downtime or as an availability loss differs from source to source, and because that choice alone changes availability and OEE substantially, changeover time must be tracked as a metric separate from OEE. The "Downtime" entry in the Lean Enterprise Institute (LEI) lexicon classifies changeovers to produce other products as planned downtime, while the Japan Institute of Plant Maintenance (JIPM) classifies setup and adjustment as a stop loss in availability. In an assumed shift (loading time 27,600 s, changeovers 3,000 s, breakdowns 600 s), availability is 87.0 % under the JIPM approach and 97.6 % under a planned-downtime approach that subtracts…

    read more
    ESS-neofab 0 Comments

    You May Also Like

    레이저 노칭 헤드 사이클타임 1.20초와 라인 택타임 0.95초를 비교해 필요 헤드 수 2대를 도출한 도식

    The Interface Between Laser Notching Cycle Time and Line Takt Time — The Head-Count Sizing Problem Revealed by DI ENT’s Ohio Supply Contract

    September 7, 2026
    고체전해질 연속공정과 조립라인 사이 버퍼재고 인터페이스 다이어그램

    Between the Continuous Solid-Electrolyte Process and the Assembly Line: How Should the Buffer Interface Be Designed?

    August 31, 2026
    46파이 원통형 셀 압력센서 데이터가 라인 PLC 직결과 BMS 게이트웨이 집선 중 어느 경로로 흐르는지 비교하는 다이어그램. 택타임 대비 게이트 점유율 34%와 13% 비교 막대그래프 포함

    46-Phi Cylindrical Cell Line Conversion: The Pressure-Sensor–BMS Interface Determines Takt Time

    August 26, 2026
© 2026 Ess-neofab · A line- and system-level record of ESS and secondary-battery manufacturing processes
  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy
  • Disclaimer
Ashe Theme by WP Royal.