본문으로 바로가기
Ess-neofab

A line- and system-level record of ESS and secondary-battery manufacturing processes

  • 한국어
  • English
  • Home
  • Process
  • System
  • Interface
  • Traceability
  • News & Trends
  • About
  • Contact
  • 한국어
  • English
  • Home
  • Process
  • System
  • Interface
  • Traceability
  • News & Trends
  • About
  • Contact

카테고리

  • Interface (28)
  • News & Trends (20)
  • Process (32)
  • System (31)
  • Traceability (22)

최근 글

  • Five million ACC cells equal 2.7 to 3.6 months of nameplate outputOctober 15, 2026
  • A 160 MW battery’s six-week commissioning has two baselinesOctober 8, 2026
  • Two Cycles a Day Take 106.8 % of a Day, and the Retention Tier Shifts Cell Volume by 1.47 GWhOctober 1, 2026
  • Battwoo’s Second-Life EV Batteries — When an 80 % Acceptance Threshold Overlaps the Retirement Distribution, Incoming Screening Becomes the BottleneckSeptember 30, 2026
  • US storage set an energy record in Q2 as installed power fell 7%September 29, 2026
  • CATL Starts Trial Production in Debrecen — The Digits of the Defect-Rate Target, Not the Equipment, Set the Length of a Trial RunSeptember 29, 2026
  • The time axis, not the cell ID, sets quarantine scope
    Process,  System,  Traceability

    Recall and Quarantine Scope vs Traceability Resolution: Lot Tracking Compared with Cell-Plus-Parameter Tracking

    July 7, 2026 /

    On an assumed line producing 25,000,000 cells per year, a process anomaly lasting 1,800 s at one station leads to a quarantine population of 196,078 cells at lot level (production-day lot plus adjacent lot), 65,359 cells at shift-lot level, 2,159 cells with cell-to-tray mapping, 2,045 cells with per-cell timestamps, and 715 cells with per-cell process-parameter linkage. The main lever that narrows the quarantine scope by roughly 30× is not the cell ID itself but time-axis resolution (lot → tray); per-cell parameter linkage narrows it by a further ~2.9×. Under 10-year retention, storage cost is below 0.1% of the quarantine cost of a single anomaly at shift-lot level, so the real…

    read more
    ESS-neofab Comments Off on Recall and Quarantine Scope vs Traceability Resolution: Lot Tracking Compared with Cell-Plus-Parameter Tracking

    You May Also Like

    ESS 3차입찰 저가수주 체인지오버 시나리오별 OEE 비교 도식

    Line Changeover Design in the Era of Low-Price ESS Round-3 Bidding — Flexible Assembly Viewed Through Takt Time and OEE

    August 28, 2026
    레이저 노칭 헤드 사이클타임 1.20초와 라인 택타임 0.95초를 비교해 필요 헤드 수 2대를 도출한 도식

    The Interface Between Laser Notching Cycle Time and Line Takt Time — The Head-Count Sizing Problem Revealed by DI ENT’s Ohio Supply Contract

    September 7, 2026
    CATL 데브레첸 시험생산에서 목표 불량률 100 ppm과 10 ppm의 무고장 입증 표본 수와 시험생산 기간 비교 도식

    CATL Starts Trial Production in Debrecen — The Digits of the Defect-Rate Target, Not the Equipment, Set the Length of a Trial Run

    September 29, 2026
© 2026 Ess-neofab · A line- and system-level record of ESS and secondary-battery manufacturing processes
  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy
  • Disclaimer
Ashe Theme by WP Royal.