본문으로 바로가기
Ess-neofab

A line- and system-level record of ESS and secondary-battery manufacturing processes

  • 한국어
  • English
  • Home
  • Process
  • System
  • Interface
  • Traceability
  • News & Trends
  • About
  • Contact
  • 한국어
  • English
  • Home
  • Process
  • System
  • Interface
  • Traceability
  • News & Trends
  • About
  • Contact

카테고리

  • Interface (28)
  • News & Trends (20)
  • Process (32)
  • System (31)
  • Traceability (22)

최근 글

  • Five million ACC cells equal 2.7 to 3.6 months of nameplate outputOctober 15, 2026
  • A 160 MW battery’s six-week commissioning has two baselinesOctober 8, 2026
  • Two Cycles a Day Take 106.8 % of a Day, and the Retention Tier Shifts Cell Volume by 1.47 GWhOctober 1, 2026
  • Battwoo’s Second-Life EV Batteries — When an 80 % Acceptance Threshold Overlaps the Retirement Distribution, Incoming Screening Becomes the BottleneckSeptember 30, 2026
  • US storage set an energy record in Q2 as installed power fell 7%September 29, 2026
  • CATL Starts Trial Production in Debrecen — The Digits of the Defect-Rate Target, Not the Equipment, Set the Length of a Trial RunSeptember 29, 2026
  • 포항 LFP 양극재 출하에서 조지아 ESS 셀 라인 입고까지 45일 리드타임과 안전재고 1,138 t를 나타낸 인터페이스 도식
    Interface,  Process

    45 Days from Pohang to Georgia — Safety Stock at an Intercontinental Cathode Interface Is Driven by Lead-Time Variability, Not Demand

    September 23, 2026 /

    SK On’s roughly KRW 1.0742 trillion LFP cathode contract with POSCO Future M (2027–2029, for its Georgia ESS cell line) puts a continent and an ocean crossing between the materials and cell plants. Under an assumed scenario (45-day lead time, σL 7 days, 98.1 t/day), safety stock in front of the Georgia cell line is about 1,138 t, 99.1% of which comes from the lead-time variability term. Halving lead-time variability cuts it to 577 t; halving demand variability leaves it at 1,136 t. At an intercontinental interface, the management variable is the spread of arrival times, not the demand forecast.

    read more
    ESS-neofab 3 Comments

    You May Also Like

    셀 조립 택타임 8.79s와 화성 체류 72h로 역산한 필요 화성 채널 약 29,500개를 비교한 라인 인터페이스 도식(가정 시나리오)

    Formation Channel Sizing Read from a Cell Assembly Equipment FAT — How 1 Second of Takt Time Moves 3,350 Channels

    September 6, 2026
    NVIDIA DSX Ready 자격 BESS 3종의 C-rate 비교 도식 — 세 제품이 0.5 C로 수렴하는 구조를 보여준다

    Why three qualified products landed on the same duration — in DSX Ready BESS, sizing is set by the output axis

    September 23, 2026
    엣지 AI 비전검사 인터페이스 3안 비교: 엣지 로컬 판정, 게이트웨이 집선, 클라우드 중앙집중의 응답시간과 Traceability 완전성 비교 도식

    Edge AI Vision Inspection and Battery-Pack Leak Testing: How Gateway Aggregation Affects Traceability Completeness

    August 27, 2026
© 2026 Ess-neofab · A line- and system-level record of ESS and secondary-battery manufacturing processes
  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy
  • Disclaimer
Ashe Theme by WP Royal.