본문으로 바로가기
Ess-neofab

A line- and system-level record of ESS and secondary-battery manufacturing processes

  • 한국어
  • English
  • Home
  • Process
  • System
  • Interface
  • Traceability
  • News & Trends
  • About
  • Contact
  • 한국어
  • English
  • Home
  • Process
  • System
  • Interface
  • Traceability
  • News & Trends
  • About
  • Contact

카테고리

  • Interface (28)
  • News & Trends (20)
  • Process (32)
  • System (31)
  • Traceability (22)

최근 글

  • Five million ACC cells equal 2.7 to 3.6 months of nameplate outputOctober 15, 2026
  • A 160 MW battery’s six-week commissioning has two baselinesOctober 8, 2026
  • Two Cycles a Day Take 106.8 % of a Day, and the Retention Tier Shifts Cell Volume by 1.47 GWhOctober 1, 2026
  • Battwoo’s Second-Life EV Batteries — When an 80 % Acceptance Threshold Overlaps the Retirement Distribution, Incoming Screening Becomes the BottleneckSeptember 30, 2026
  • US storage set an energy record in Q2 as installed power fell 7%September 29, 2026
  • CATL Starts Trial Production in Debrecen — The Digits of the Defect-Rate Target, Not the Equipment, Set the Length of a Trial RunSeptember 29, 2026
  • Isometric concept of a changeover split into internal work while stopped and external work while running, from last piece to first good piece
    Process

    Is a Changeover Planned Downtime or an Availability Loss? — How the Definition Changes OEE

    September 25, 2026 /

    Whether a changeover (also called a setup) counts as planned downtime or as an availability loss differs from source to source, and because that choice alone changes availability and OEE substantially, changeover time must be tracked as a metric separate from OEE. The "Downtime" entry in the Lean Enterprise Institute (LEI) lexicon classifies changeovers to produce other products as planned downtime, while the Japan Institute of Plant Maintenance (JIPM) classifies setup and adjustment as a stop loss in availability. In an assumed shift (loading time 27,600 s, changeovers 3,000 s, breakdowns 600 s), availability is 87.0 % under the JIPM approach and 97.6 % under a planned-downtime approach that subtracts…

    read more
    ESS-neofab 0 Comments

    You May Also Like

    레이저 노칭 헤드 사이클타임 1.20초와 라인 택타임 0.95초를 비교해 필요 헤드 수 2대를 도출한 도식

    The Interface Between Laser Notching Cycle Time and Line Takt Time — The Head-Count Sizing Problem Revealed by DI ENT’s Ohio Supply Contract

    September 7, 2026
    포항 LFP 양극재 출하에서 조지아 ESS 셀 라인 입고까지 45일 리드타임과 안전재고 1,138 t를 나타낸 인터페이스 도식

    45 Days from Pohang to Georgia — Safety Stock at an Intercontinental Cathode Interface Is Driven by Lead-Time Variability, Not Demand

    September 23, 2026
    ESS-LFP 라인 5단 공정 흐름과 양산전환 6개월 구간 OEE 목표 시나리오(1개월 61%, 3개월 74%, 6개월 85%) 도식

    The Equipment Maker’s Line-Ownership Shift — OEE and Takt-Time Design During the ESS-LFP New-Line Mass-Production Ramp-Up

    August 23, 2026
  • 설계 능력 2.5 GWh와 셀 공급 1 GWh 조건에서 OEE가 36.9% 또는 83.8%로 보고되는 분모 분류 차이 도식
    Process,  System

    A 2.5 GWh Line Fed Only 1 GWh of Cells — OEE of 36.9% and 83.8% Describe the Same Line

    September 25, 2026 /

    Advait Group’s supply agreement with Hithium for 314 Ah LFP cells (up to 1 GWh over the next year, 18 September 2026) feeds a 2.5 GWh/yr assembly plant with only 40% of its design capacity. Under an assumed scenario, the same line with the same output reports an OEE of 36.9% if cell-shortage time is counted as availability loss, and 83.8% if it is separated as planned downtime and available operating time is matched to supply. The 46.9-point gap comes from the OEE denominator rule, not the equipment; on supply-constrained lines, the loading ratio should be reported alongside OEE.

    read more
    ESS-neofab 2 Comments

    You May Also Like

    EVE–Fluence 206 GWh 계약의 연도별 물량 계단 그래프 — 2027년 16 GWh에서 2028년 이후 47.5 GWh로 2.97배 뛰는 구조

    16 GWh committed and 190 GWh reserved — what absorbs the 2.97x step is the contract, not the line

    September 27, 2026
    레이저 노칭 헤드 사이클타임 1.20초와 라인 택타임 0.95초를 비교해 필요 헤드 수 2대를 도출한 도식

    The Interface Between Laser Notching Cycle Time and Line Takt Time — The Head-Count Sizing Problem Revealed by DI ENT’s Ohio Supply Contract

    September 7, 2026
    LFP 고압축밀도 전환 시 캘린더링 닙압력·라인속도 인터페이스와 택타임·OEE 영향 시나리오 도식

    LFP High-Compaction-Density Conversion and the Calendering Interface: How Nip Pressure and Line Speed Affect Takt Time

    September 1, 2026
© 2026 Ess-neofab · A line- and system-level record of ESS and secondary-battery manufacturing processes
  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy
  • Disclaimer
Ashe Theme by WP Royal.